HOW TO
As we
all know, the Social Security system is currently the proverbial “third rail”
in the American political system – NO one
will touch it, and few politicians will even discuss it in public or on the
record! This is no longer acceptable
because of course, Social Security, in it current operational form and economic state is nothing more than a Ponzi
pyramid fraud and con-game run by the
Currently,
the Social Security system is one of the largest financial “problems” this
nation faces, as it has set an unsustainable course for national insolvency
that some American generation is simply going to have to eventually address in
the relatively near future. However,
because of its politically “untouchable”
status, the Social Security system has grown through the years to become a
huge, unintended entitlement program that
is guaranteed to break the nation’s budget and bankrupt the American people, if
its current operations are not reformed, transformed, and restored, now. What do I mean by restored? Well, the Social Security system was never designed or intended to operate
as the entitlement program that it currently pretends to be, it was
intended to be, and under the
actual written provisions of the statutes of the United States Code enacted is,
a welfare program that is supported by a tax.
The truth
about the Social Security system is that it was never intended to be an
entitlement program, OR an insurance
policy, OR a pension plan, OR a retirement funds program for anyone. It was intended to be, and was originally
legislated as, A WELFARE PROGRAM THAT IS
SUPPORTED BY A TAX.
The
fact that across time this welfare program, that was originally intended to be
only for “widows and orphans”, has
been transformed by socially “progressive”
politicians into a financially debilitating national entitlement program that
is on course to bankrupt both the American government and nation if it isn’t
changed soon, must be addressed by the new crop of conservative congressmen
(and women) coming to Washington in January.
Of course, this turns out to very easy to
do, because there is no politician on Capitol Hill who can, in today’s
economic reality, stand in front of the American People (or the TV cameras) and
defend the current Social Security Administration’s practice of giving welfare
checks to millionaires. And that of
course is exactly what is going on in the Social Security system. Every month thousands of millionaires are
needlessly sent millions of dollars of Social Security WELFARE benefit checks
by the Social Security Administration, while the nation sinks into financial
oblivion and eventual bankruptcy.
Currently
of course, the system allows EVERYONE
and ANYONE in
And
of course this means that this so-called Social Security “system”, as a welfare system,
is a complete and total failure,
because it operates with precisely the
opposite effect that it was intended to have when it was originally enacted
and was “sold” to the American People as a welfare
system that was intended and designed to help the poor “widows and orphans”.
However, instead of providing the needed monthly benefits to the poor,
the disabled, the indigent, and the “widows
and orphans”, it now operates
instead as a legal entitlement for the middle and upper classes, who
receive much of the benefit moneys paid out, despite having no real financial need, which is paid as an entitlement based on contribution, rather than as a welfare benefit based on
need. The program thus, for the
most part, fails the poor because most
of them don’t live long enough to ever be eligible to claim any meaningful
benefit, after they paid the tax for their entire working lives.
Thus
the so-called welfare system, in its current perversely insane operation, has
precisely the opposite effect of what was originally intended; - instead of taking money from the wealthy
and giving it to the poor at the end of their lives, it rather takes money from the working poor for their entire lives, and
distributes it amongst the wealthy and middle class as an entitlement (for
the “secure”). The insecure, the poor, never
see any real return on their lifetime’s contributions because the age of
eligibility to file a claim for a benefit is set so high that most of the working
poor NEVER ATTAIN THAT
This makes the system FUDAMENTALLY
IMMORAL as it takes, NOT FROM THE RICH TO GIVE TO THE POOR, BUT rather, only
TAKES from the POOR to give to the already wealthy. Exactly the opposite of what a truly moral
system would do. Exactly the opposite of
what was originally intended. The system of course was designed that way, because
that’s the only way it can exist. The
government simply can’t afford to pay for everyone in the country, rich and
poor, to live well to age 100, so they run this fraudulent program to deceive
you into believing that they will take care of you when you are old, if you
will only vote for them when you are young.
But they don’t, and they won’t, because they can’t. Just ask anyone who
is dependent on Social Security for their month to month existence if the
benefits paid are sufficient to live well.
So, how do we fix this untouchable
entitlement monstrosity before it financially destroys us? THAT’S EASY, all you need to do is RESTORE
the original intended fundamental MORALITY to the program, and
That’s where you begin. There is no politician in America that will
stand in public (or in front of the TV cameras) and defend giving welfare
checks to millionaires as a general welfare policy, and that is the way
to get a “handle” on this national problem.
Because once you admit that we should not be giving welfare checks to millionaires, I will immediately
then ask, well how about the guy worth $950,000.00 ($50,000 less), should he
get a welfare check?
Most
people will agree that he too, should NOT
be allowed to get a welfare check, as $950,000.00 is plenty of money
sufficient for one (or two) to live well for many years, where properly
utilized within their “means”. So, one
is immediately led to the bottom line question of; “What is the amount of
wealth an individual (and / or a couple) should be allowed to have, before he
/she / they are disqualified from receiving any Social Security welfare benefit
checks, regardless of how old they are?”
And of course, that is not for me
or any one person to decide or dictate to the rest of the nation. That is a matter that must be put up for
national discussion and then settled within Congress with law after
debate.
However,
once you have established this “means
test” as an additional, now controlling part of the eligibility
requirements for claiming Social Security benefits, we will be able to
eliminate almost a third of the current Social Security recipients for at least
half of their benefit eligible life,
if not more. This means, you can
substantially lower the overall rate of the Social Security tax. This means the effective rate of tax could be
cut nearly in half from the current 16% of payroll, to a lower 8% burden, that
would be imposed similarly as today, with 4% being collected by withholding
from the participating employee, and a matching 4% being collected from the
employer. Thus providing tax relief and
stimulating economic recovery.
The
4% collected from the employers should then be used to fund the account from
which the benefit claims are paid to eligible persons, and the 4% withheld from
the employee should be routed, NOT
into that general disbursement fund, but into a personal retirement savings
account that can be invested under the control of the individual employee
himself in certain low risk types of investments, i.e. certain approved stocks,
bonds, funds, Bills, and notes.
Of course,
because it is a “tax” that is intended to use the wealth of the nation to help
support the impoverished at the end of their lives, there should be no cap, as
their currently is, on the amount of an individual’s earnings that are subject
to the tax. Currently, only the first
$90,000 of a person’s earnings are subject to the tax. That should end. IF the tax is 8%, then everyone should pay
the full 8%, including the very wealthy, who will now, under these proposed
changes, probably never get a dime in benefits. HOWEVER, remember, NO MONEY was actually taken from those
wealthy persons because the 4% withheld from their pay is still in their own personal retirement investment account, - it
was only the employer’s matching 4% that was contributed to the benefit claims
fund. This of course makes the program
constitutional as no property is actually taken from the citizens as tax, and
the taxation of the businesses’ “employment”
can be legitimately sustained as an excise tax.
These discussion ideas for effectively reforming the
Social Security system are distributed by www.Tax-Freedom.com